Difference between revisions of "User talk:SimonMRnudey"
(→Re: your message on Twitter) |
SimonMRnudey (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:Got it: can't send you a DM via Twitter ''from my personal account''! Replying via the Dutch WNBR account is also a problem, I would have to do that on a 2" screen... | :Got it: can't send you a DM via Twitter ''from my personal account''! Replying via the Dutch WNBR account is also a problem, I would have to do that on a 2" screen... | ||
:For now: please read my response to [[User_talk:Robjordan#Re:_Folkestone|Robjordan]]. - [[User:Erik Baas|Erik Baas]] ([[User talk:Erik Baas|talk]]) 18:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC) | :For now: please read my response to [[User_talk:Robjordan#Re:_Folkestone|Robjordan]]. - [[User:Erik Baas|Erik Baas]] ([[User talk:Erik Baas|talk]]) 18:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ok, but the old file Med.gif that you waned to keep was the 2019 poster that I no longer need, did you look at the page its self before changing it |
Revision as of 18:10, 29 April 2021
Why did you blank the pages Colchester, Chelmsford, Cambridge, Clacton and Ipswich? - Erik Baas (talk) 11:14, 19 February 2019 (PST)
Because they are NOT genuine Rides in the Uk and are using the WNBR name its all been talked about on the WNBR UK Organisers and Marshals group on facebook, those rides are known as the Fake 5 and only a naked jolly and willy waving show that have no interests in the genuine causes of the WNBR
Simon Mouncey I remind people that the Clacton ride deliberately rode past 4 childrens play areas and when asked about that Robert said 'there's nothing wrong with the human body' again. It is his mantra and sole reason for doing the rides, to show off. If it was for body postivity he would be trying to make the ride more diverse or expand it. If it was for health and fitness he woudnt be riding an electric bike (twist throttle). The wnbr and those who go on the rides provide a shield and safe space for him, which without the law 'it is not illegal to be naked in public as he drones on' on his side would be seen as offending. We arent trying to test the law and its limits, he is. He risks the whole wbnr movement
Barry Freeman I agree that the 4Cs throw the name of the WNBR into disrepute. They shouldn't be allowed to use WNBR in their publicity nor claim their rides are WNBR when they aren't. It's a great shame that some WNBRs that ARE fit and proper have chosen to drop "WNBR" from their publicity and I hope they will return to using it to show they aren't just for fun "naked bike rides", just an excuse to ride naked, And I say that as a life-long naturist. Much as I enjoy riding naked I do it to support the purposes of the WNBR, not just for my own pleasure. It is not, as one rider told me last year, "a bit of a laugh" - we are raising awareness of many serious issues. There is no excuse at all for leaping off bikes to pose naked in a selfie with female bystanders, which sadly seems to be the growing craze.
Barry Freeman from the UK who rides the Amsterdam WNBR just told me he knows you
Re: your message on Twitter
I can't reply on Twitter, did you block me?. I will reply on this page later today. - Erik Baas (talk) 17:31, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
No I have not blocked you lol as I know you are a genuine WNBR
- Got it: can't send you a DM via Twitter from my personal account! Replying via the Dutch WNBR account is also a problem, I would have to do that on a 2" screen...
- For now: please read my response to Robjordan. - Erik Baas (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
ok, but the old file Med.gif that you waned to keep was the 2019 poster that I no longer need, did you look at the page its self before changing it