User talk:SimonMRnudey

Why did you blank the pages Colchester‎, Chelmsford‎, Cambridge‎, Clacton‎ and Ipswich‎? - Erik Baas (talk) 11:14, 19 February 2019 (PST)

Because they are NOT genuine Rides in the Uk and are using the WNBR name its all been talked about on the WNBR UK Organisers and Marshals group on facebook, those rides are known as the Fake 5 and only a naked jolly and willy waving show that have no interests in the genuine causes of the WNBR

Simon Mouncey I remind people that the Clacton ride deliberately rode past 4 childrens play areas and when asked about that Robert said 'there's nothing wrong with the human body' again. It is his mantra and sole reason for doing the rides, to show off. If it was for body postivity he would be trying to make the ride more diverse or expand it. If it was for health and fitness he woudnt be riding an electric bike (twist throttle). The wnbr and those who go on the rides provide a shield and safe space for him, which without the law 'it is not illegal to be naked in public as he drones on' on his side would be seen as offending. We arent trying to test the law and its limits, he is. He risks the whole wbnr movement

Barry Freeman I agree that the 4Cs throw the name of the WNBR into disrepute. They shouldn't be allowed to use WNBR in their publicity nor claim their rides are WNBR when they aren't. It's a great shame that some WNBRs that ARE fit and proper have chosen to drop "WNBR" from their publicity and I hope they will return to using it to show they aren't just for fun "naked bike rides", just an excuse to ride naked, And I say that as a life-long naturist. Much as I enjoy riding naked I do it to support the purposes of the WNBR, not just for my own pleasure. It is not, as one rider told me last year, "a bit of a laugh" - we are raising awareness of many serious issues. There is no excuse at all for leaping off bikes to pose naked in a selfie with female bystanders, which sadly seems to be the growing craze.