User talk:SimonMRnudey

Why did you blank the pages Colchester‎, Chelmsford‎, Cambridge‎, Clacton‎ and Ipswich‎? - Erik Baas (talk) 11:14, 19 February 2019 (PST)

Because they are NOT genuine Rides in the Uk and are using the WNBR name its all been talked about on the WNBR UK Organisers and Marshals group on facebook, those rides are known as the Fake 5 and only a naked jolly and willy waving show that have no interests in the genuine causes of the WNBR

Simon Mouncey I remind people that the Clacton ride deliberately rode past 4 childrens play areas and when asked about that Robert said 'there's nothing wrong with the human body' again. It is his mantra and sole reason for doing the rides, to show off. If it was for body postivity he would be trying to make the ride more diverse or expand it. If it was for health and fitness he woudnt be riding an electric bike (twist throttle). The wnbr and those who go on the rides provide a shield and safe space for him, which without the law 'it is not illegal to be naked in public as he drones on' on his side would be seen as offending. We arent trying to test the law and its limits, he is. He risks the whole wbnr movement

Barry Freeman I agree that the 4Cs throw the name of the WNBR into disrepute. They shouldn't be allowed to use WNBR in their publicity nor claim their rides are WNBR when they aren't. It's a great shame that some WNBRs that ARE fit and proper have chosen to drop "WNBR" from their publicity and I hope they will return to using it to show they aren't just for fun "naked bike rides", just an excuse to ride naked, And I say that as a life-long naturist. Much as I enjoy riding naked I do it to support the purposes of the WNBR, not just for my own pleasure. It is not, as one rider told me last year, "a bit of a laugh" - we are raising awareness of many serious issues. There is no excuse at all for leaping off bikes to pose naked in a selfie with female bystanders, which sadly seems to be the growing craze.

Barry Freeman from the UK who rides the Amsterdam WNBR just told me he knows you

Re: your message on Twitter

I can't reply on Twitter, did you block me?. I will reply on this page later today. - Erik Baas (talk) 17:31, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

No I have not blocked you lol as I know you are a genuine WNBR

Got it: can't send you a DM via Twitter from my personal account! Replying via the Dutch WNBR account is also a problem, I would have to do that on a 2" screen...

For now: please read my response to Robjordan. - Erik Baas (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

ok, but the old file Med.gif that you waned to keep was the 2019 poster that I no longer need, did you look at the page its self before changing it,

No, the files were identical. Hence the word "duplicate". - Erik Baas (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

as for Twitter messaging it must be down to your Twitter settings or you just don't want to reply to me on there

Didn't you read my previous message? Here it is again:

:Got it: can't send you a DM via Twitter from my personal account! 

Besides: why do you want to discuss WNBR-wiki matters via Twitter? Why not on WNBR wiki itself, like we're doing now? Also: my name is Erik Baas, not WNBR Nederland. You chose the wrong Twitter account. - Erik Baas (talk) 20:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

About these duplicated files: it just happened again: you uploaded File:Gif2021.gif, which is a 1:1 copy of File:Webp.net-gifmaker (25).gif. The page says:

The following file is a duplicate of this file: File:Webp.net-gifmaker (25).gif

BTW: both titles are rather useless, and prone to accidentally being overwritten by someone else. You should at least have the word Folkestone" in every title. - Erik Baas (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

If you look at the page its self you will see that the Gif files DO have Folkestone on them and if someone else did upload them surely they would see that

The name should be in the title as well. Believe me, it has happened before! See for instance the history of File:Poster 2018.pdf. - Erik Baas (talk) 20:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)