Talk:Saint Louis
The St. Louis world naked bike ride was awesome it was well worth can't wait to do it again
Great event, but switching the starting location right before the event was a huge problem. I drove around in circles trying to find the place - clearly, it was no longer at the Pool Pavilion, and no signs stating otherwise. Think about it - for a event all about ending oil dependency, having people driving around defeats the purpose!
We probably should have hired a stripper or two to ride. You always need someone to start the ball rolling. Not many wanted to go first. I'll add to the Saint Louis 2008 later. I want others to have their chance to post, too.
Next year - daytime? And if you want crowds to bring publicity, post signs along the route. And publish the correct route. A circular route is best.
And I want to say thanks to User:Nsayers for editing my comment here. Most people would not edit other people's words on a discussion page, but it is nice to see some people do lack respect for others by modifying the words of others no matter where they may be. It is all in the wiki tradition, right? If I had a broken link it would be one thing, but by deleting the page I made and then hiding all traces to it, User:Nsayers went above and beyond... much beyond - beyond what is considered normal wiki-etiquette.
I can understand why 90% of the other pages are devoid of images, but rather links to Flcker and other sharing sites. The entire idea of WNBR is respect. It is unfortunate some lack it. You can modify the entries. You can add images and galleries that others thought best not to do. You can even make a hundred new entries taking the reader in an endless circle. But deleting pages someone wanted and then editing their comments that lead to those pages is rather adolescent and completely disrespectful.
Anyone wishing to add images needs to be forewarned. And let's all thank User:Nsayers for making the Saint Louis page Not Safe for Work (NSWF). --Photo212grapher 15:31, 3 August 2008 (PDT)
