Difference between revisions of "Talk:Photography policy"
(==Policy too restrictive==) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Policy too restrictive== | ==Policy too restrictive== | ||
| − | This London-style photo policy I think it a bit more restrictive than some would like. Seattle does permit photography before and after people are on their bikes. [[User:D|D]] 09:37, 3 Apr 2006 (PDT) | + | This London-style photo policy I think it a bit more restrictive than some would like. Seattle does permit photography before and after people are on their bikes and some photography is allowed at the bodypainting part. But we do have restrictions. |
| + | |||
| + | I do believe that there should be photography/video monitors, in addition to everybody who enforces policy, and photographers/videographers should know that if they are aggressive or are conistantly making others feel uncomfortable and breaking policy we have the right to photograph and videotape them and publish their image online. [[User:D|D]] 09:37, 3 Apr 2006 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:42, 3 April 2006
Policy too restrictive
This London-style photo policy I think it a bit more restrictive than some would like. Seattle does permit photography before and after people are on their bikes and some photography is allowed at the bodypainting part. But we do have restrictions.
I do believe that there should be photography/video monitors, in addition to everybody who enforces policy, and photographers/videographers should know that if they are aggressive or are conistantly making others feel uncomfortable and breaking policy we have the right to photograph and videotape them and publish their image online. D 09:37, 3 Apr 2006 (PDT)
