Difference between revisions of "Talk:San Francisco"
("publicity" section wont link to the files.) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the **images** that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? [[User:Hilarleo|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the **images** that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? [[User:Hilarleo|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Something's up with the "publicity" section. I dont get a link to the files. [[User:Hilarleo|Hilarleo]] 04:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:15, 4 June 2010
JAZ, love what you've done in just a few weeks. That logo is off the hook ;-) You rule the interweb.
As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the **images** that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? Hilarleo 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Something's up with the "publicity" section. I dont get a link to the files. Hilarleo 04:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)