Difference between revisions of "Talk:Twin Cities/Minneapolis and Saint Paul"
(Lets talk about a TC WNBR) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The flaunting of traffic laws, the harrassing car drivers, perceived as not family friendly, etc. | The flaunting of traffic laws, the harrassing car drivers, perceived as not family friendly, etc. | ||
I think this sort of thing is counter-productive to the cause of promoting bicycling. | I think this sort of thing is counter-productive to the cause of promoting bicycling. | ||
| − | I would regret such a | + | I would regret such a tone for a TC WBNR. |
| + | |||
| + | I have no idea what the MN laws on nudity are. (In VT it's legal to be naked in public but you have to take your clothes off in private.) | ||
If you are interested in a family friendly TC WBNR, leave a note here or email me. | If you are interested in a family friendly TC WBNR, leave a note here or email me. | ||
Fred Olson [[User:Fholson|Fholson]] 05:59, 16 June 2009 (PDT) | Fred Olson [[User:Fholson|Fholson]] 05:59, 16 June 2009 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:46, 16 June 2009
Has there been any discussion of a Twin Cities WNBR? I'd be interested in talking about it. The idea of using nudity to attract attention in a crowded media environment is a real hoot.
The Critical Mass ride in TC seems to me to have had an unfortunate confrontational aspect. The flaunting of traffic laws, the harrassing car drivers, perceived as not family friendly, etc. I think this sort of thing is counter-productive to the cause of promoting bicycling. I would regret such a tone for a TC WBNR.
I have no idea what the MN laws on nudity are. (In VT it's legal to be naked in public but you have to take your clothes off in private.)
If you are interested in a family friendly TC WBNR, leave a note here or email me. Fred Olson Fholson 05:59, 16 June 2009 (PDT)
