User talk:D - Revision history

D: /* Surely press ''is'' media?! */

2007-02-18T20:46:01Z

‎Surely press ''is'' media?!

Nsayers: /* Surely press ''is'' media?! */

2006-06-16T08:37:36Z

‎Surely press ''is'' media?!

D: response

2006-06-16T00:27:41Z

response

Nsayers: /* Brussels ride */

2006-06-15T12:15:37Z

‎Brussels ride

Nsayers: /* Saint Petersburg */

2006-06-15T12:06:39Z

‎Saint Petersburg

Nsayers at 11:30, 15 June 2006

2006-06-15T11:30:08Z

Velojef at 09:03, 11 June 2006

2006-06-11T09:03:13Z

Velojef at 09:01, 11 June 2006

2006-06-11T09:01:15Z

Velojef at 13:37, 8 June 2006

2006-06-08T13:37:32Z

Velojef at 13:36, 8 June 2006

2006-06-08T13:36:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 18 February 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:I would love to have one word but I had someone point out to me that the press is not the media nor is it vice versa and the two are distinct and some get uptight about this. Maybe we can ask someone in the press and media? Its not that big of a deal though. I just don't want to sound biased one way or the other. Best, [[User:D\|D]] 17:27, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)		:I would love to have one word but I had someone point out to me that the press is not the media nor is it vice versa and the two are distinct and some get uptight about this. Maybe we can ask someone in the press and media? Its not that big of a deal though. I just don't want to sound biased one way or the other. Best, [[User:D\|D]] 17:27, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)
	::These references seem to state conclusively that media does include print (ie: press) media: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media], [http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861678609/media.html], [http://www.reference.com/browse/crystal/20901] --[[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 01:37, 16 Jun 2006 (PDT)		::These references seem to state conclusively that media does include print (ie: press) media: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media], [http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861678609/media.html], [http://www.reference.com/browse/crystal/20901] --[[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 01:37, 16 Jun 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	==Font==
		+
		+	Daniel, See my user talk for answer to font question. Marte.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 16 June 2006
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Daniel, I suggest we rename the [[Press and media coverage]] page back to 'Media coverage' – press is one of the many media that now includes TV, radio, internet, ''and'' traditional newspapers, magzines etc. --[[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 04:30, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)		Daniel, I suggest we rename the [[Press and media coverage]] page back to 'Media coverage' – press is one of the many media that now includes TV, radio, internet, ''and'' traditional newspapers, magzines etc. --[[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 04:30, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)
	:I would love to have one word but I had someone point out to me that the press is not the media nor is it vice versa and the two are distinct and some get uptight about this. Maybe we can ask someone in the press and media? Its not that big of a deal though. I just don't want to sound biased one way or the other. Best, [[User:D\|D]] 17:27, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)		:I would love to have one word but I had someone point out to me that the press is not the media nor is it vice versa and the two are distinct and some get uptight about this. Maybe we can ask someone in the press and media? Its not that big of a deal though. I just don't want to sound biased one way or the other. Best, [[User:D\|D]] 17:27, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)
		+	::These references seem to state conclusively that media does include print (ie: press) media: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media], [http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861678609/media.html], [http://www.reference.com/browse/crystal/20901] --[[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 01:37, 16 Jun 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 16 June 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Daniel, I suggest we rename the [[Press and media coverage]] page back to 'Media coverage' – press is one of the many media that now includes TV, radio, internet, ''and'' traditional newspapers, magzines etc. --[[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 04:30, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)		Daniel, I suggest we rename the [[Press and media coverage]] page back to 'Media coverage' – press is one of the many media that now includes TV, radio, internet, ''and'' traditional newspapers, magzines etc. --[[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 04:30, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)
		+	:I would love to have one word but I had someone point out to me that the press is not the media nor is it vice versa and the two are distinct and some get uptight about this. Maybe we can ask someone in the press and media? Its not that big of a deal though. I just don't want to sound biased one way or the other. Best, [[User:D\|D]] 17:27, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Brussels ride==
+==[[Brussels]] ride==
-'''(NEW)''' infos from Léa (lea989 at yahoo.fr) ... NO problem to use the stuff but if you need her works_files, please ask them by mail (cause the png compressed one doesn't give terrible professional work ;-)
+'''(NEW)''' infos from Léa (lea989 at yahoo.fr) ... NO problem to use the stuff but if you need her works files, please ask them by mail (cause the PNG compressed one doesn't give terrible professional work ;-)
 ==Germany rides==
 Hi Daniel. Have you spoken to anyone in [[List of rides#Germany|Germany]] about their plans for rides? The locations they've put down are all quite vague (ie: each is in the form "City/Region"). They've also not conformed to the English naming convention used for all other ride locations.For example: "München/Bayern, Bavaria" should be just "Munich (München)" if that's where the ride is. What are your thoughts? - [[User:Nsayers|Nsayers]] 11:51, 27 Mar 2006 (PST)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Hi again. The naming of Saint Petersberg bothers me. [[Saint Petersburg, Russia]] is much more famous than [[Saint Petersburg]], Florida. I think the names should be swapped to "Saint Petersburg" (Russia) and "Saint Petersburg, FL". What do you think? - [[User:Nsayers|Nsayers]] 11:51, 27 Mar 2006 (PST)
 :I agree[[User:D|D]] 14:27, 30 Mar 2006 (PST)
 ==Surely press ''is'' media?!==
 Daniel, I suggest we rename the [[Press and media coverage]] page back to 'Media coverage' – press is one of the many media that now includes TV, radio, internet, ''and'' traditional newspapers, magzines etc. --[[User:Nsayers|Nsayers]] 04:30, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 15 June 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Hi again. The naming of Saint Petersberg bothers me. [[Saint Petersburg, Russia]] is much more famous than [[Saint Petersburg]], Florida. I think the names should be swapped to "Saint Petersburg" (Russia) and "Saint Petersburg, FL". What do you think? - [[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 11:51, 27 Mar 2006 (PST)		Hi again. The naming of Saint Petersberg bothers me. [[Saint Petersburg, Russia]] is much more famous than [[Saint Petersburg]], Florida. I think the names should be swapped to "Saint Petersburg" (Russia) and "Saint Petersburg, FL". What do you think? - [[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 11:51, 27 Mar 2006 (PST)
	:I agree[[User:D\|D]] 14:27, 30 Mar 2006 (PST)		:I agree[[User:D\|D]] 14:27, 30 Mar 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	==Surely press ''is'' media?!==
		+
		+	Daniel, I suggest we rename the [[Press and media coverage]] page back to 'Media coverage' – press is one of the many media that now includes TV, radio, internet, ''and'' traditional newspapers, magzines etc. --[[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 04:30, 15 Jun 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 8 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Brussels ride==
		+	Hi D,Yes Nice [http://wiki.worldnakedbikeride.org/index.php?title=Brussels poster] indeed ! It a Lea (and Titom) works, I think under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/be/ by-nc-nd] ... if needed i suppose you can contact them at [http://www.bxl.attac.be/spip/article.php3?id_article=468 http://www.bxl.attac.be/spip/article.php3?id_article=468] or [http://www.bxl.attac.be/spip/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=12 http://www.bxl.attac.be/spip/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=12] Have a nice day an d ride, jef
		+
	==Germany rides==		==Germany rides==
	Hi Daniel. Have you spoken to anyone in [[List of rides#Germany\|Germany]] about their plans for rides? The locations they've put down are all quite vague (ie: each is in the form "City/Region"). They've also not conformed to the English naming convention used for all other ride locations.For example: "München/Bayern, Bavaria" should be just "Munich (München)" if that's where the ride is. What are your thoughts? - [[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 11:51, 27 Mar 2006 (PST)		Hi Daniel. Have you spoken to anyone in [[List of rides#Germany\|Germany]] about their plans for rides? The locations they've put down are all quite vague (ie: each is in the form "City/Region"). They've also not conformed to the English naming convention used for all other ride locations.For example: "München/Bayern, Bavaria" should be just "Munich (München)" if that's where the ride is. What are your thoughts? - [[User:Nsayers\|Nsayers]] 11:51, 27 Mar 2006 (PST)