Talk:San Francisco - Revision history

Erik Baas: /* Date Mismatch */

2023-12-31T22:19:18Z

‎Date Mismatch

LandRider: /* Date Mismatch */ new section

2023-12-31T19:27:07Z

‎Date Mismatch: new section

JamesAZaun: Replies to Leo's comments

2011-01-09T18:49:48Z

Replies to Leo's comments

Hilarleo at 06:43, 11 June 2010

2010-06-11T06:43:36Z

Hilarleo: "publicity" section wont link to the files.

2010-06-04T04:15:49Z

"publicity" section wont link to the files.

Hilarleo at 22:25, 3 June 2010

2010-06-03T22:25:41Z

Hilarleo: Hi JAZ

2010-06-03T22:22:34Z

Hi JAZ

New page

JAZ, love what you've done in just a few weeks. As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it is what it is. It's only the **images** that revolve around London. I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? [[User:Hilarleo|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 31 December 2023
Line 15:		Line 15:
	...is 21 September, while the date appearing in the calendar poster directly below the list is 28 September. This mismatch needs to be resolved and the incorrect date corrected.		...is 21 September, while the date appearing in the calendar poster directly below the list is 28 September. This mismatch needs to be resolved and the incorrect date corrected.
	Thank you.		Thank you.
		+	:Changed it to 28, thank you! - [[User:Erik Baas\|Erik Baas]] ([[User talk:Erik Baas\|talk]]) 22:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 31 December 2023
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Leo, I'm guessing you are trying to get the PDF pages to display directly in the wiki, yes/no? I have successfully gotten PDF pages to display in MediaWiki's directly by using a MediaWiki Flash extension. I have written an Adobe ExtendScript for Illustrator CS4 that will convert a PDF to a set of Flash pages complete with MediaWiki markups. However, it requires that Conrad (or whoever manages the wiki) install a specific Flash extension so the SWFs can be uploaded into the wiki. The Flash pages preserve the original PDF formatting including graphics. I didn't ask Conrad if he would be willing to do that or not. There are some security concerns with uploading Flash content into the wiki. I could also go the SVG route but I don't think the wiki allows SVG uploads either. [[User:JamesAZaun\|JamesAZaun]] 18:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)		: Leo, I'm guessing you are trying to get the PDF pages to display directly in the wiki, yes/no? I have successfully gotten PDF pages to display in MediaWiki's directly by using a MediaWiki Flash extension. I have written an Adobe ExtendScript for Illustrator CS4 that will convert a PDF to a set of Flash pages complete with MediaWiki markups. However, it requires that Conrad (or whoever manages the wiki) install a specific Flash extension so the SWFs can be uploaded into the wiki. The Flash pages preserve the original PDF formatting including graphics. I didn't ask Conrad if he would be willing to do that or not. There are some security concerns with uploading Flash content into the wiki. I could also go the SVG route but I don't think the wiki allows SVG uploads either. [[User:JamesAZaun\|JamesAZaun]] 18:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Date Mismatch ==
		+
		+	The date of the September, 2024, ride in the list of rides on this page...
		+
		+	https://wiki.worldnakedbikeride.org/index.php?title=San_Francisco
		+
		+	...is 21 September, while the date appearing in the calendar poster directly below the list is 28 September. This mismatch needs to be resolved and the incorrect date corrected.
		+	Thank you.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-JAZ, love what you've done in just a few weeks. That logo is off the hook ;-) You rule the interweb.
+JAZ, love what you've done in just a few weeks. That logo is off the hook ;-) You rule the interweb. As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the **images** that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge?  [[User:Hilarleo|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
-As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the **images** that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge?  [[User:Hilarleo|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
+: Leo, feel free to edit the wikipedia entry if you want. I'll contribute any images that you may like or grab any of the images off the SF WNBR wiki page since they must be copyright free. [[User:JamesAZaun|JamesAZaun]] 18:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
-JAmes, WikiPedia etiquette says that rather than offer a pdf, one ought to make a page for that text. That's not appropriate here. But I'm having problems getting the pdf link to 'pipe' normally, & I assume it's related. So your nice syntax is  breaking down. [[User:Hilarleo|Hilarleo]] 06:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
+: Leo, I'm guessing you are trying to get the PDF pages to display directly in the wiki, yes/no? I have successfully gotten PDF pages to display in MediaWiki's directly by using a MediaWiki Flash extension. I have written an Adobe ExtendScript for Illustrator CS4 that will convert a PDF to a set of Flash pages complete with MediaWiki markups.  However, it requires that Conrad (or whoever manages the wiki) install a specific Flash extension so the SWFs can be uploaded into the wiki. The Flash pages preserve the original PDF formatting including graphics. I didn't ask Conrad if he would be willing to do that or not.  There are some security concerns with uploading Flash content into the wiki.  I could also go the SVG route but I don't think the wiki allows SVG uploads either. [[User:JamesAZaun|JamesAZaun]] 18:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:43, 11 June 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:


−	~~Something~~'s ~~up with the "publicity" section~~. I ~~dont get a~~ link to ~~the files~~. [[User:Hilarleo\|Hilarleo]] 04:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)	+	JAmes, WikiPedia etiquette says that rather than offer a pdf, one ought to make a page for that text. That's not appropriate here. But I'm having problems getting the pdf link to 'pipe' normally, & I assume it's related. So your nice syntax is breaking down. [[User:Hilarleo\|Hilarleo]] 06:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 4 June 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the images that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? [[User:Hilarleo\|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)		As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the images that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? [[User:Hilarleo\|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	Something's up with the "publicity" section. I dont get a link to the files. [[User:Hilarleo\|Hilarleo]] 04:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 3 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	JAZ, love what you've done in just a few weeks. As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it ~~is what it is. It~~'s only the images that revolve around London. I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? [[User:Hilarleo\|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)	+	JAZ, love what you've done in just a few weeks. That logo is off the hook ;-) You rule the interweb.
		+
		+	As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the images that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? [[User:Hilarleo\|Hilarleo]] 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)