Difference between revisions of "User talk:SomeHuman"

From World Naked Bike Ride
Jump to: navigation, search
(Notes on List of rides page)
(Notes on List of rides page: Moved)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Notes on List of rides page==
 
== Notes on List of rides page==
 
+
Moved to [[Talk:List of rides#Keeping all rides' statuses updated|the page's Discussion page]], as the discussion is in particular relevant for that single page and may concern its other editors and readers as well.<br ?>
Hi. Thanks for your contributions to the wiki. I appreciate your wish to clarify the status of rides on the [[List of rides]] page – it has a lot of questionable information about smaller or non-English-speaking ride locations. However, I'm concerned that your lengthy, red-letter, inline notes have made the page more cluttered, less reassuring for potential riders, and more confusing for editors to work out if rides were mooted but abandoned, or rumoured to have actually taken place. I've edited the sections I know the details of (UK etc), and I would like to tidy things up more. Please can we discuss a tidier way forward? --[[User:Nsayers|Nsayers]] 17:15, 10 December 2009 (PST)
+
[[User:SomeHuman|SomeHuman]] 2009-01-04 07:35 / 08:09 (GMT)
 
 
:Replied on [[User_talk:Nsayers|Nick Sayers' talk page]] -- [[User:SomeHuman|SomeHuman]] 2009-12-29 22:22 (GMT)
 
 
 
Hi again. Thanks for your diligent, enthusiastic work on the wiki. However, I'm sorry to say I'm about to revert the recent edits you've made to the [[List of rides]] page. I think the changes you've made make the page more convoluted and confusing. I would prefer that the following changes are ''not'' made again in future:
 
 
 
* "Future" ride dates that have passed without clarification on whether they took place:<br />These should be left as they are, for local experts or people with evidence of the rides' status to correct accordingly. Adding the text "(Previously suggested rides: ...)" and footnotes just adds clutter to an already busy page. The current set-up isn't ideal, but without sufficient dedicated local wiki editors to verify and maintain ride info, I think it's the best way to maintain a reasonably easy-to-read and accurate list of rides.
 
* Footnotes, if they are added (I'd prefer not), should be formatted like citations so they're linked properly. There's some way to do this with wiki mark-up, but I'm not sure how.
 
* Please don't add spaces before ?s (eg: "June 2010?", not "June 2010 ?")
 
* Please don't pluralise previous ride dates if there has only been one (eg: "Previous ride: 14 Jun 2009", not "Previous ride''s'': 14 Jun 2009")
 
 
 
Thanks mate. I'd be happy to discuss this with you by phone, Skype or instant messaging (message me for details) - it might be easier and quicker to come to some agreement on how to move forward. Sorry if I seem harsh, but I want to keep the rides list tidy. --[[User:Nsayers|Nsayers]] 21:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 08:11, 4 January 2010

Notes on List of rides page

Moved to the page's Discussion page, as the discussion is in particular relevant for that single page and may concern its other editors and readers as well.
SomeHuman 2009-01-04 07:35 / 08:09 (GMT)