Difference between revisions of "Talk:San Francisco"
("publicity" section wont link to the files.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| − | + | JAmes, WikiPedia etiquette says that rather than offer a pdf, one ought to make a page for that text. That's not appropriate here. But I'm having problems getting the pdf link to 'pipe' normally, & I assume it's related. So your nice syntax is breaking down. [[User:Hilarleo|Hilarleo]] 06:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | |
Revision as of 06:43, 11 June 2010
JAZ, love what you've done in just a few weeks. That logo is off the hook ;-) You rule the interweb.
As far as the WNBR Wikipedia entry, it's only the **images** that revolve around London. & I know SF can come up with comparable pictures to contribute. which will be the huge publicity for SF. Can we deal with huge? Hilarleo 22:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
JAmes, WikiPedia etiquette says that rather than offer a pdf, one ought to make a page for that text. That's not appropriate here. But I'm having problems getting the pdf link to 'pipe' normally, & I assume it's related. So your nice syntax is breaking down. Hilarleo 06:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
